Archive for 2011

Hate Speech?

Tuesday, December 27th, 2011

Thankfully, complaints addressed to our parish are few and far between. I did, however, receive two irate phone messages over the Christmas weekend, possibly from the same family.

The man and the woman each complained about the bells we played after the midnight mass on Christmas Eve; they said the bells waked them up as well as children who were staying with them.

I can understand the complaints; we stopped playing the daily bells at 9 AM so as not to disturb people who work night shifts, and I can imagine some people might be annoyed at being waked up. However, we do this only once a year, and few people work on Christmas Day, so the annoyance should be manageable. Outside noise from construction and traffic in the middle of the night is not exactly unknown in this busy neighborhood.

Most unusually, in his message, the man referred to “#@*&! Christians” while the woman said she “hated” our church and would never attend there. I wonder if they would have used these terms about a synagogue or a mosque. In any event, I had no way to respond or express sympathy, since the messages were anonymous. –J. Douglas Ousley


Quoted in the NY Times

Monday, December 19th, 2011

I achieved a tiny measure of fame/notoriety over the weekend by being quoted in the Times. I referred to Trinity Church’s accommodation of “the marginal group of protestors” of Occupy Wall Street. 

The word, “marginal” seems what is most likely to get me in trouble. The issue for church people: does this movement express the prophetic Gospel and speak truth to power or is it merely the media inflation of a ragtag collection of malcontents and publicity seekers?

As I have said before, there are many bad guys in the financial industry who have gotten away with high crimes and who should be punished. OWS, however, seems to have done little to bring them to justice. –J. Douglas Ousley


The Good Book

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

As many in the English-speaking world celebrate the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible–the most re-printed English translation even today, it is fitting that a reference to Scripture (Mt. 13.12) appeared as the headline on the two New York tabloids yesterday. The Bible is part of our culture–one of many reasons that it should be studied in the most secular schools.

“The Rich Get Richer” referred to the recent lottery win by some financial tycoons. They apparently plan to give some of the mega-millions away, which wouldn’t disappoint the source of the Scripture, who also said that the poor in spirit would be blessed–but who also said that in the fullness of time, “the rich would be sent empty away.” –J. Douglas Ousley


The People Speak

Monday, November 21st, 2011

I expect to offer several reflections on the recent election in the coming days.

But first in most Episcopalians’ minds must be the fact that our bishop coadjutor-elect was first rejected by the Nominating Committee. He was then nominated by petition; he led on the first ballot; and he won by a huge majority on only the third ballot. The official system failed; the people won.

And most of us present in the Cathedral of St. John the Divine also noticed that Canon Andrew Dietsche seemed to be the least concerned of the candidates with being a spokesperson for the church in the media and on the national and international stage. Rather, he would try to help struggling parishes to survive and flourish. Many of us share this priority and we should be grateful that the election results seem to endorse this emphasis on the parish. –J. Douglas Ousley


Finally, the End of the Beginning?

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

The weather forecast is clement and the postponed election for a Bishop-Coadjutor for the Diocese of New York seems set to happen this Saturday.

While many clergy and laity continue to mull over the qualities of the various candidates and rumors circulate, the mood in Manhattan seems more subdued than it was three weeks ago. Perhaps, “resigned” is a better word. We will not be offered the candidates of our dreams so we shall have to choose from among the ones set before us.

That said, I don’t think nominations from the floor can be ruled out, and it is at least possible that the convention will be deadlocked. Perhaps these prospects are contributing to the subdued consciousness. But they at least give us additional reasons to pray for the Diocese of New York. –J. Douglas Ousley


Shepherd of a Dwindling Flock

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011

Since the convention last Saturday to elect a new Bishop of New York was postponed due to the snowstorm, we have three extra weeks to brood about the election.

In the meantime, the Episcopal Church has released figures on 2010 that indicate yet more decline. Down 16% in membership in the past ten years, the annual decline last year increased from 2% to 3%. Median attendance has gone from 72 in 2006 to 65 in 2010.

The 2012 proposed budget for the Diocese of New York also appeared recently, and it projects one-third of diocesan expenditure devoted to the numerous parishes which are not self-supporting.

Happily, every candidate for bishop has talked about the need for congregational growth and development. Yet the extreme spiritual and financial challenges of our church at this time may have been the major reasons why so many able candidates from within our diocese declined to stand for election. –J. Douglas Ousley


Trinity Church Zuccotti Park?

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

“We welcome any of those involved in the protest for pastoral care and reflection.” These words from the Rector of Trinity Church Broadway might have been expected. After all, Father Cooper could hardly have said, “We refuse to meet any protestors who seek pastoral care or reflection.”

On the other hand, Trinity Church has often made much of its links with Wall Street. And much of its historical fame has been based on its vast wealth derived from Wall Street landholdings and stocks. I wonder about its anodine “welcome” to protestors who–as far as anything they say is coherent–seem to be attacking the foundations on which Trinity stands. I also question whether the same welcome would be extended to a group of Tea Party activists. But that’s another story. –J. Douglas Ousley 


Diocesan Politics Continued…

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011

Meetings, caucuses, and phone calls are multiplying as the October 29 Diocesan Convention to elect a new Bishop of New York approaches. 

At least from my limited point of view in Manhattan, there seems to be no front runner. The two write-in candidates from the diocese have the advantage of being well-known and well-liked–and the disadvantage that their limitations as bishop-material are also well-known. The five candidates nominated by committee are almost equally unknown; while they have their supporters, most delegates I know remain uncommitted. Much will depend on the “walkabouts” to introduce the candidates that will take place during the week of October 16.

The nominating committee has been criticized for coming up with no candidates of national stature. Members of the committee have apparently indicated that a number of prominent clergy declined to be nominated; I know several wonderful priests who withdrew their names, including the person I myself nominated. I hope that these refusals even to be considered aren’t an indication that the job is unmanageable. –J. Douglas Ousley


Diocese of New York to Manhattan: Drop Dead?

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

Just before Labor Day, the diocesan nominating committee announced its list of five candidates for Bishop of New York. They all seem to be able church leaders.

However, they are hardly persons of stature, nor are their accomplishments exceptional–especially compared to previous bishops of New York prior to their elections.

And–while I know this is a very parochial concern about a small matter in the history of things–there are no candidates with any apparent connection with the Diocese of New York, not to mention Manhattan, where so many historic Episcopal parishes are located.

Moreover, there are very few opportunities planned to meet the candidates; Manhattan delegates to the electoral convention will have to attend a “walkabout” on a Friday afternoon at 1 PM–not easy for the working lay delegates.

I have previously complained about the lack of Manhattan clergy on the nominating committee–or in other diocesan committees. I realize, too, that the days of cardinal rectors and noblesse oblige are long gone. Nor do I have a personal ax to grind; I don’t like committees and am too old to be a bishop.

But I know so many talented colleagues in Manhattan whose advice and counsel is sought throughout the nation and world–and whose leadership potential in our own diocese is ignored. –J. Douglas Ousley


Party Faithful

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011

The recent, seemingly endless controversy over raising the limit to the national debt seemed often to hinge on principles. Hard-liners on both sides of the debate were afraid to act contrary to their core beliefs, while moderates in both parties realized that compromise would be necessary for the crisis to be resolved.

How like the conflicts in the Anglican Communion–where conservatives and liberals fear that the slightest deviations from their traditionalist or progressive doctrines will spell the end of the Kingdom of God.

In both politics and religion, the party faithful might consider the possibility that compromise is also a path to the true and the just. –J. Douglas Ousley